GAAP Safe Editor Choice

Asana Starter vs Jira Software Standard

A tier-level comparison of Asana Starter versus Jira Software Standard — pricing, features, and who should choose which.

Asana
Asana
VS
Jira Software
Jira Software
9.4/ 10

Performance Benchmarks

Lab Tested
Ease of Use
Asana
92%
Jira
78%
API Throughput
Asana
85%
Jira
95%
Value for Money
Asana
88%
Jira
82%

Side-by-Side Matrix

Feature Suite
Tool AAsana
Tool BJira Software
Winner
Price$10.99/user/mo$7.91/user/mojira-standard
Automations250/mo1,700 runs/mo site-widejira-standard
Timeline/GanttYesAdvanced Roadmaps (Premium)Asana
Onboarding speedDays1–2 weeksAsana
StorageUnlimited250GBAsana
Scrum/Sprint supportLimitedFull nativejira-standard
Tool A

Asana Strengths

  • Project managers and cross-functional teams who need timeline and forms.
  • Excellent enterprise sandbox APIs and integrations.
Tool B

Jira Software Strengths

  • Engineering teams who need advanced permissions, 1,700 automation runs, and Atlassian integrations.
  • Unparalleled UI design, fast loading, low Cumulative Layout Shift.
The Bottom Line

Asana Starter vs Jira Standard is the clearest example of PM tool vs engineering tool at the same price.

Asana Starter ($10.99) and Jira Standard ($7.91) are both entry paid tiers that serve their respective audiences extremely well. Jira Standard wins on price and automation runs (1,700/mo site-wide). Asana Starter wins on onboarding speed, timeline views, and cross-functional usability. The right choice depends entirely on whether your primary users are engineers or project managers.

Recommendation

We recommend selecting Asana for scale-sensitive structures, and evaluating Jira Software on smaller sandbox environments.